admin
December 14, 2019
Airbus S.A.S. v. Firepass Corporation No. 2019-1803 Fed. Cir. Before Circuit Judges Lourie, Moore, and Stoll. Airbus S.A.S. appealed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s reversal of the patent examiner’s rejection of certain new claims presented by patent owner Firepass Corporation in an inter partes reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,418,752. The issue on appeal […]
admin
November 14, 2019
Honeywell International Inc. v. Arkema Inc. Nos. 2018-1151, 2018-1153 Fed. Cir. October 1, 2019 Before Circuit Judges Newman, Reyna, and Hughes. During a post grant review proceeding, Honeywell sought authorization from the Board to file a motion for leave to petition the Patent and Trademark Office Director for a Certificate of Correction to correct a […]
admin
September 19, 2019
The Toro Company sought inter partes review before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The Board held the challenged claims obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Critical to its decision, the Board determined that the claim term “mechanical control assembly . . . configured to [perform certain functions]” is not a means-plus-function term subject to 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6. MTD Products Inc. appealed.
admin
August 19, 2019
Westech Aerosol Corporation v. 3M Company, et al.
Westech appealed the decision of the district court for the Western District of Washington granting 3M’s motion to dismiss for improper venue. Considering the Supreme Court’s ruling in TC Heartland, 137 S.Ct. 1514 (2017), 3M moved to amend its motion to dismiss to include an argument that venue was improper because 3M did not have a regular and established place of business in the judicial district.
admin
July 19, 2019
TQ Delta, LLC v. Dish Network LLC
TQ Delta appealed a Final Written Decision (FWD) of the PTAB finding, inter alia, that claims 6, 11, 16 and 20 of TQ Delta’s U.S. Patent No. 8,611,404 (“the ‘404 patent”) were unpatentable as obvious. The ‘404 patent relates to the field of multicarrier transmission systems which provide high speed data links between communication points [and have recently been used] … for communications over the local subscriber loop that connects a telephone service subscriber to a central telephone office. The invention is described in the context of an ADSL system having a first transceiver located at the site of a customer’s premises as well as a second transceiver located at a local central telephone office.
admin
March 26, 2018
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC No. 2017-1560 Fed. Cir. Feb. 9 2018 Opinion by Circuit Judge Stoll with Circuit Judges Taranto and Clevenger. Merck filed an infringement suit alleging that, if approved by the FDA, Amneal’s proposed Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) product would infringe U.S.Patent No. 6,127,353. Following a bench trial, the district court […]
admin
January 26, 2018
TRAVEL SENTRY, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. DAVID A. TROPP, Defendant-Appellant 2016-2386, 2016-2387, 2016-2714, 2017-1025 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in Nos. 1:06-cv-06415-ENV- RLM, 1:08-cv-04446-ENV-RLM, Judge Eric N. Vitaliano. For the third time, the Court presided over this dispute regarding whether Travel Sentry, Inc. (“Travel Sentry”) and its licensees infringed […]
admin
December 26, 2017
PRESIDIO COMPONENTS, INC. v. AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP. 2016-2607, 2016-2650 Presidio filed suit against American Technical Ceramics Corp. (“ATC”) for patent infringement. The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s holdings that the claims of the patent are not indefinite and that ATC is entitled to absolute intervening rights because a substantive amendment was made during […]
admin
November 26, 2017
Organik Kimya AS v. Rohm And Haas Co. Nos. 2015-1983, -2001 Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2017 Opinion by Circuit Judge Newman with Chief Judge Prost and Circuit Judge Taranto Organik appeals the decisions of the PTAB in two IPR proceedings. The PTAB sustained the patentability of claims U.S Patent No. 6,020,435 (“the ’435 Patent”) and […]
admin
September 26, 2017
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., Appellant v. MEXICHEM AMANCO HOLDING S.A. DE C.V., DAIKIN INDUSTRIES, LTD., Appellees 2016-1996 Decided: August 1, 2017 Opinion by Circuit Judge Lourie with Circuit Judge Reyna Opinion dissenting-in-part by Circuit Judge Wallach Honeywell appealed from a decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board affirming the Examiner’s […]
